Ne demişler : Popüler olanın taklidi de çok olurmuş misali dolandırıcılar da Linux kullanan ufak bir kesimimi hedef alacaklar ? Biraz da şeytanın avukatlığını yaparsan neden Windows ta dolandırıcılar var bellidir. Hintli filan olmaları da ilginç ama ... Her yerden varlar... Hindistan artık Çin i de geçti . En nüfuslu ülke Hindistan dır. Hindistan da ayrıca matematik dahil ciddi bir eğitimli insanlar yetiştiriliyor. Doktor dan yazılımcıya kadar Hindular bariz belirgin. Antivirüs firmaları esas virüsleri yapıp yayıyor sonra da kendileri ilk veya en iyi biz çözeriz diye ticaretini de reklamını da yapıyor ( komplo teorisi Hindu filan odaklı değildir herkesi kapsar ... ) ... Hindistan devasa bir ülke ... Amerika'dan bile büyük .. |
Linux kullananlar ne yapacağını biliyorlar zaten :D Windows kullanan basit kullanıcıları avlamak zevklidir. Güvenlik adına nereden tutsan elinde kalıyor Windows. |
Hacker lar ayrıca az birşey artan Linux kullanım oranlarına karşı Linux dağıtımlılarına da saldıyorlar. Esasında Linux dağıtımlıları pek tercih edilmediği kullanılmadığı için kimsecikler hacklemiyordu ama bu değişti... Son yıllarda Linux Kernel seviyesinde devlet destekli saldırılara şahit olduk. Bunda Microsoft çalışanı ama gönüllü boş vakitlerinde katkı yapan biri tesadüfen işkilendi açığa çıkardı.. Test Kernel olsa da o fasıl birkaç yılda herkese açık Kernel de olacaktı... Linux Kernel ini geliştirenlerin en başındakilerden biri de psikolojik sorunları varmış o yüzden fark edememiş itiraf etti... Serbest Yazılım böyle! Bu işler öyle olmaz ... Serbest Yazılım ile gevşek disiplinsiz güvensiz bir ortam olmuş! Kendi içinde sağlık odaklı denetleme bile yok ... Microsoft çalışanı olmasayfı Kurumsal odaklı Linux Kernel i kullanılan nice sunucular devletler ve kurumları hacklenecekti 3. Dünya Savaşı içinden geçilir olacaktı ... Ucuz atlattık Microsoft çalışanı sayesinde Linux Alemi ucuz kurtardı. Saldırı Kernel seviyesinde olsaydı kimseler Linux kullanmaz olurdu felaketler sonrasında . Devlet zaten kesin uzak dururlardı... Bence de şuan daha tedirginlerdir Linux açık kaynak kodlu olmasının belasını her türlü çekiyor çektiriyor ... Şansa da yaşanılıyor.. Aman dikkat. |
Xz açığından sadece Debian ve forkları etkilendi ki 1 gün geçmeden düzelttiler. Rhel forkları, Arch forkları, nix os vs etkilenmedi. Kapalı kaynak ta 0 gün açıkları ve diğer açıklar en fazla kaç ayda düzeltilir? Windows 20 yıllık açığı kapatmamış. Linux'ta durumun farkedildiği gün açık kapandı. Açıktan dolayı Rus geliştiriciler yasaklandı. Edit:Debian etkilenmemiş Arch etkilenmiş. |
Özgür değilsin Layneks te. Ne sunarsa onla yetinirsin. Yetindiği şeylerde uçar kaçardır ... Uyumsuzluk cabası o yüzden dual boot kullanırlar ... Bir de Bitlocker meselesi var :) Linux dağıtımlılarında yok! Windows u da güvensiz hale getirip korsanvari kullanılması da hiç hoş değil kendileri güvensiz hale getiriyorlar sonra da bilmem ne oldu derler ... Windows güvenlkte geliştirilmiştir. Linux dağıtımlıları fragmantasyonla parça parça olmuşlar ... Kullanılan uygulamalar bol olacağına Linux dağıtımlıları binlerce çeşit olmuş! Gel de uğraş bir uygulama geliştiricisi hepsine de destek mi sunsun ? Sonu baştan bellidir. İdealistlik değildir aymazlıktır. Sonu baştan bellidir. Ama gönül ister ki dişli rakip olması yönünde ama yok! Apple ve Microsoft var ... |
Özgür yazılık açık kaynak vs ilk başta hoş ama gerçek alem acımasız. Rusu var Çinlisi var hatta Hindusu da var hatta Amerikalısı da Avrupalısı da ... Kişi veya ülke destekli hacker olduğu sürece açık kaynak kodlu herşey risklidir derim ve o yüzden de kapalı olacak ki yol geçen hanı olmasın... |
Özgür değil miyim? Windowsa göre mi! Hehe, çekirdeği hardened olarak seçebiliyor kendi kafama göre kerneli derleyebiliyorum. Uyumsuzluk? Sürücü desteğinde yazdım cevaplamadın. Uygulama alternatifleri var zaten, yok o uygulamalar benlik değil dersen geçmezsin olur biter. Windows mu güvenli yönetici yetkisini evet butonuna basarak hiç bir koruma şekli olmadan aldığın super user yetkisi mi windows'u güvenli yapıyor? Mac os tek özelliği görünüm ve abartılmış render Vs özelliği. |
Aynı şekilde bende Windows'a linux'tan daha fazla güvenirim. Windows'un ne olduğu, nerelerde kimlerin kullandığı, kolayca güvenlik yazılımıyla nasıl güvenliğini sağlayabileceğiniz vs. hepsi belli. Hiçkimse linux'un kodlarını baştan sona okumamıştır ve okuyamaz da, bir güvenlik açığı çıktığında elbette bunu kapatmaya uğraşırlar fakat ortaya çıkana kadar da bunu sömürürler. Linux = başıboşluk Windows = neidüğü bellilik Tamam fedora yada freebsd yükledin diyelim, güvenlik önlemlerini de aldın. Sonra? Ertesi gün banka hesapların boşaltılmış olarak buldun kendini. Kime ne diyeceksin. Kendin ettin kendin buldun başıbozuk neidüğü belirsiz bir şeyler yükleyip bütün birikimini emanet ettin. Hata kimde? Özgür yazılım açık kaynak = otomatik olarak güvenlik demek değildir. Mecbur kalmadıkça şahsi bilgisayarımda Windows ile devam.. |
https://www.webtekno.com/gimp-yeni-surum-h153806.html Güncellemeleyi yıllarca yapmamışlar... Gerçi bahsedilecek çok şey var. Bu sadece biri. Rezalet! Mahkum olmak. Sonra da kaçamak kaçamak Windows altında da kullanmalar .. |
Kernel seviyesi güvenlik açığı olunca tüm Linux dağıtımlıları da dahil oluyor. Yani Pardus bile ... Yerli denilen ama Kernel i yabancı. Kodları yabancı bile risklidir. Aramızda temel seviyede bilmeden tehlikenin boyutlarını da idrak edemiyor ve hala ısrarla özgür ve güvenli olduklarını savunuyorlar veya oralı olmayarak ta savunduklarını beyan ediyorlar... Şaka gibi. Bazen de bırak ne halleri varsa görsünler diyorum... Bir musibet bin nasihatten yeğdir ! ... |
steam os genel kullanıcıya hitap etmez We expect most SteamOS users to get SteamOS preinstalled on a Steam Machine. Although we have made SteamOS freely available for anybody to install, the installation experience is not intended for a non-technical user. yani steam os sadece teknik kişilere ve cihaz üreticilerine önerilmiş. bunun yerine genel kullanıcı kitlesine uygun en kolay en çok kullanılan sürüm olan ubuntu öneririm. başka bir kullanıcıya 2 ay önce attığım cevabı da buldum onu da kopyalayayım. 1)O dağıtımda çalışıp bu dağıtımda çalışma meselesi Linux'da bir çok dağıtım olmasına rağmen bu dağıtımlar aslında yüzde 90 iki dağıtımın alt dağıtımları Bunlar arch ve debian mesela manjaro ve steam os arch tabanlı ububtu ve mx linux debian tabanlı linux mint kubuntu lubuntu ubutu tabanlı. Yine bizim pardus da debian tabanlı. .deb paketleri bu debian tabanlı olanların hepsinde çalışıyor arch için yazılmış olanlar da arch olan tüm distrolarda çalışıyor. Arch repoları çok hızlı güncellenir bu yüzden yeni başlayan birine arch önerilmez. çünkü yazılımlarda hata olabilir. Debian ise stabildir geç güncellenir ama sorun çıkartmaz. İyi test edilmiş paketler vardır.
KodYığını:yazıyoruz hoop oturumu kapatıp kdeye geçiyoruz sonra oturumu kapatım yeniden gnome'a geçiyoruz. Ama bu olay yüzde 2 anca yaşamışımdır ben. 3 Linux çöker mi? Linux çökertmesi gayet zor bir sistem nedeni şu siz linux'un grafik arayüzünü çökertseniz bile terminal arayüzü ayakta kalıyor bu sayede terminale girip sorunu çözebliyorsunuz. Ben şöyle bir durum yaşadım denemek için kendi sistemime uygun olmayan nvidia driver yükledim kendiminkini de kaldırdım sonuç olark pc çöktü ama hemen yanına bir mx linux kurdum mx linuxDan chmod yapıp diğer sisteme bağlandım kurduğum driver'ı sildim diğer eski driver'ı kurdum sistem stabil bir biçimde devam etti. Böyle kolay anlatıyorum burda ama 40 satıra yakın kod yazmıştım ama bir şekilde sistemi illaki kurtarırsınız.
! LinuxScoop youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv-PhOMa1go&list=PLKopOf5__2tj0aVUX68Kyr9rNltrLTWDq 1)O dağıtımda çalışıp bu dağıtımda çalışma meselesi Linux'da bir çok dağıtım olmasına rağmen bu dağıtımlar aslında yüzde 90 iki dağıtımın alt dağıtımları Bunlar arch ve debian mesela manjaro ve steam os arch tabanlı ububtu ve mx linux debian tabanlı linux mint kubuntu lubuntu ubutu tabanlı. Yine bizim pardus da debian tabanlı. .deb paketleri bu debian tabanlı olanların hepsinde çalışıyor arch için yazılmış olanlar da arch olan tüm distrolarda çalışıyor. Arch repoları çok hızlı güncellenir bu yüzden yeni başlayan birine arch önerilmez. çünkü yazılımlarda hata olabilir. Debian ise stabildir geç güncellenir ama sorun çıkartmaz. İyi test edilmiş paketler vardır. 2) dağıtım çok farketmiyor peki masaüstü ortamları farkeder mi? Mesela ubuntu gnome ile fedora kde ile geliyor bunlar uygulamada sorun çıkartıyor mu? Evet çıkartıyor gnome ile daha iyi çalışıp kde'de kde ile daha iyi çalışıp gnome'da iyi çalışmayan uygulamalar var. Ama çözümü basit mesela ubuntu gnome ile geliyor. Terminale girip ``` KodYığını: sudo apt update sudo apt install kubuntu-desktop ``` yazıyoruz hoop oturumu kapatıp kdeye geçiyoruz sonra oturumu kapatım yeniden gnome'a geçiyoruz. Ama bu olay yüzde 2 anca yaşamışımdır ben. 3 Linux çöker mi? Linux çökertmesi gayet zor bir sistem nedeni şu siz linux'un grafik arayüzünü çökertseniz bile terminal arayüzü ayakta kalıyor bu sayede terminale girip sorunu çözebliyorsunuz. Ben şöyle bir durum yaşadım denemek için kendi sistemime uygun olmayan nvidia driver yükledim kendiminkini de kaldırdım sonuç olark pc çöktü ama hemen yanına bir mx linux kurdum mx linuxDan chmod yapıp diğer sisteme bağlandım kurduğum driver'ı sildim diğer eski driver'ı kurdum sistem stabil bir biçimde devam etti. Böyle kolay anlatıyorum burda ama 40 satıra yakın kod yazmıştım ama bir şekilde sistemi illaki kurtarırsınız. 4) Masaüstü ve kısayollar tamamen özelleştirilebiliyor istersen pc nizi kde kullanarakmac os ya da windows'a hatta playstatio arayüzüne çevirebilirsiniz. Bu yaratıcılığınıza bağlı. Mesela şu şekil. KodYığını: sudo apt update sudo apt install kubuntu-desktop !https://s.ytimg.com/yts/img/favicon_144-vfliLAfaB.png **LinuxScoop** youtube [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv-PhOMa1go&list=PLKopOf5__2tj0aVUX68Kyr9rNltrLTWDq](https://forum.donanimhaber.com/ExternalLinkRedirect?module=after-renderer-for-new-editor&messageId=159932411&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv-PhOMa1go&list=PLKopOf5__2tj0aVUX68Kyr9rNltrLTWDq) 1. Neden dual boot değil de kvm ya da waydroid bunlar emülatör mü? Bunlar emülatör değil sadece başlatıcı gibi mesela waydraoid kuruyorsunuz waydraoid içine google play kurup içinden hill clim racing kurdunuz artık o hill climb racing linux uygulaması gibi shortcutı oluyor waydroidi ayrıca çamanıza gerek yok normal uygulama gibi kullanabiliyorsunuz sizin çekirdeğiniz üstünde çalışıyor. Bunu yapmak için tek gereken waydroidinizi google'dan kimlik istemek 5 dk alıyor. Ancak linux x86 desteği olan bütün android uygulamalarını çalıştırmanıza izin veriyor. ayrıyetten oynamak istediğiniz oyunları söyleyin ben bakayım oynanıyor mu? ya da siz şurdan proton desteğine kendiniz bakın https://www.protondb.com altın ve platin olanlar sorunsuz çalışır. |
Sürücü muhabbeti artık geride kaldı. Ezbere yorum yapmaktan vazgeç bence. En son 10 yıl önce yükledin sanırım çünkü bu bahsettiğin şeyler biteli yıllar oldu. |
mediatek işi bozuyor hocam biraz sitemde mediatek yoksa yüzde 99 çalışır. mediatekin de çalışan bir kaç driverı var ama bakmak lazım. |
Sırf oyun odaklı Nvidia ın birçok özelliği Windows ta sunuluyor ama Linux türevlerinde halen tam uyumlu değildir. Ama kabaca Linux te sürücü var mı ? Evet var... Seni kıstasın bu tür şeylerde .. |
hocam bu konuda yanlışsınız. dünyadaki serverların yüzde 95 üstü linux kullanıyor bu yüzden linuxda sorun çıktığında dünya interneti çöker modemlerin switchlerin serverların hepsi linux. hatta microsoft bile rhel server kullanıyor. bu yüzden linuxun 1. amacı güvenlik. linux içinde bütün hardwareler bulunan tek bir monolitik çekirdek mesela pcye siz linux masaüstü kurdunuz server başka kurdu samsung android kurdu o da linux çekirdeği bunları hepsi birbirinin aynı koları içeren tek bir monolitik çekirdek windows gibi sonradan sürücü kurulamıyor. bu yüzden dünyadaki sitemlerin hepsi bu çekirdeğe bağlı olduğundan dünyanın en güvenilir çekirdeği. |
2023 yılı yani yakın zamanda ele alınmış kapsamlı bir Linux neden hazır değildir sorunları vs ele alınmış hakkında bir makale işte : https://itvision.altervista.org/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html Preface: In this regularly but rarely updated article, which is without doubt the most comprehensive list of Linux distributions' problems on the entire Internet, we only discuss their main problems and shortcomings (which may be the reason why some people say Linux distros are not ready for the desktop) while everyone should keep in mind that there are areas where Linux has excelled other OSes: excellent package management within one distro, multiple platforms and architectures support out of the box, usually excellent stability, no widely circulating viruses or malware, complete system reinstallation is almost never required, besides, Linux is extremely customizable, easily scripted and it's free as in beer. Again, let me reiterate it, this article is primarily about Linux distributions, however many issues listed below affect the Linux kernel (the core of Linux distros and Android) as well. This is not a Windows vs. Linux comparison, however sometimes you'll find comparisons with Windows or Mac OS as a point of reference (after all, their market penetration is in an order of magnitude higher). Most issues listed below are technical by nature, however some of them are "political" (it's not my word - it's what other people say) - for instance when companies refuse to release data sheets or they release incomplete data sheets for hardware, thus Linux users don't get all the features or respective drivers have bugs almost no one in the Linux community can resolve. I want to make one thing crystal clear - Windows, in some regards, is even worse than Linux and it has its own share of critical problems. Off the top of my head I want to name the following quite devastating issues with Windows: • Windows rot, • no enforced file system and registry hierarchy (I have yet to find a single serious application which can uninstall itself cleanly and fully), • no true safe mode, • the user as a system administrator (thus viruses/malware - most users don't and won't understand UAC warnings), • no good packaging mechanism (MSI is a fragile abomination), • no system-wide update mechanism (which includes third party software), • Windows is extremely difficult to debug, • Windows boot problems are often fatal and unsolvable unless you reinstall from scratch, • Windows is hardware dependent (especially when running from UEFI), • heavy file system fragmentation on SSD disks, • Windows updates are terribly unreliable and they also waste disk space, etc. Probably you've heard many times that Android thus Linux is conquering the entire world since it's running on the majority of smart phones (which are indeed little specialized computers but not desktops). However there are two important things to keep in mind - firstly, Android is not Linux (besides, have you seen anyone running Android on their desktop or laptop?). Android contains the only Linux component - the kernel (moreover, it's a fixed old version which is maintained and supported solely by Google). Secondly, Android is not a desktop OS, it's an OS for mobile phones, tablets and other touch screen devices. So, this article is not about Android, it's about a horde of Linux distributions and Open Source Software included by these distributions (called "distro" below). Feel free to express your discord in the comments section. Attention: Greenish items on the list are either partially resolved, not crucial, questionable, or they have workarounds. This list desperately needs to be reorganized because some of the problems mentioned here are crucial and some are not. There's a great chance that you, as a user, won't ever encounter any of them (if you have the right hardware, never mess with your system and use quite a limited set of software from your distro exclusively). Here are a few important considerations before you start reading this article:
<p class="ql-align-justify"> </p>Desktop Linux Problems and Major Shortcomings (For those who hate reading long texts, there's a TL;DR version below).
</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Applications development is a major PITA. Different distros can use a) different library versions, b) different compiler flags, c) different compilers. This leads to a number of problems raised to the third power. Packaging all dependent libraries is not a solution, because in this case your application may depend on older versions of libraries which contain serious remotely exploitable vulnerabilities.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Two most popular open source desktops, KDE and Gnome, can configure only a few settings by themselves thus each distro creates its own bicycle (applications/utilities) for configuring a boot loader/firewall/users and groups, services, etc.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">Linux is a hell for ISP/ISV support personnel. Within the organization you can force a single distro on anyone, but it cannot be accomplished when your clients have the freedom to choose.</li>
</li><li class="ql-align-justify">Seems like there are lots of uniquely gifted people out there thinking I'm an idiot to write about this. Let me clarify this issue: whereas in Windows security updates are mandatory and they are usually installed automatically, Linux is usually administered via SSH and there's no indication of any updates at all. In Windows most server applications can be updated seamlessly without breaking services configuration. In Linux in a lot of cases new software releases require manual reconfiguration (here are a few examples: ngnix, apache, exim, postfix). The above two causes lead to a situation when hundreds of thousands of Linux installations never receive any updates, because their respective administrators don't bother to update anything since they're afraid that something will break.</li><li class="ql-align-justify"> </li><li class="ql-align-justify">August 2016 report from Kaspersky corroborates my thesis: in the first seven months of 2016 the number of infected Linux servers increased by 70%.</li><li class="ql-align-justify"> </li><li class="ql-align-justify">Ubuntu, starting with version 16.04 LTS, applies security updates automatically except for the Linux kernel updates which require reboot (it can be eliminated as well but it's tricky). Hopefully other distros will follow.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Fixed applications versions during a distro life-cycle (except Firefox/Thundebird/Chromium). Say, you use DistroX v22.10 which comes with certain software. Before DistroX 24.10 gets released some applications get updated, get new exciting features but you cannot officially install, nor use them.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Let's expand on the previous point. Most Linux distros are made such a way you cannot upgrade their individual core components (like kernel, glibc, Xorg, Xorg video drivers, Mesa drivers, etc.) without upgrading your whole system. Also if you have brand new hardware oftentimes you cannot install current Linux distros because almost all of them (aside from rare exceptions) don't incorporate the newest kernel release, so either you have to use alpha/development versions of your distro or you have to employ various hacks in order to install the said kernel.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">Some people argue that one of the problems that severely hampers the progress and expansion of Linux is that Linux doesn't have a clear separation between the core system and user-space applications. In other words (mentioned throughout the article) third-party developers cannot rely on a fixed set of libraries and programming interfaces (API/ABI) - in most other OSes you can expect your application to work for years without recompilation and extra fixes - it's often not possible in Linux.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">No native or/and simple solutions for really simple encrypted file sharing in the local network with password authentication (Samba is not native, it's a reverse engineered SMB implementation, it's very difficult for the average Joe to manage and set up. Samba 4 reimplements so many Linux network services/daemons - it looks like a Swiss knife solution from outer space).</li><li class="ql-align-justify">Glibc by design "leaks" memory (due to heap fragmentation). Firefox for Linux now uses its own memory allocator. KDE Konsole application uses its own memory allocation routines. Neil Skrypuch posted an excellent explanation of this issue here.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Just (Gnome) not enough (KDE) manpower (X.org) - three major Open Source projects are seriously understaffed.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! It's a major problem in the tech industry at large but I'll mention it anyways because it's serious: Linux/open source developers are often not interested in fixing bugs if they cannot easily reproduce them (for instance when your environment substantially differs from the developer's environment). This problem plagues virtually all Open Source projects and it's more serious in regard to Linux because Linux has fewer users and fewer developers. Open Source developers often don't get paid to solve bugs so there's little incentive for them to try to replicate and squash difficult to reproduce bugs.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! A galore of software bugs across all applications. Just look into KDE or Gnome bugzilla's - some bugs are now over ten years old with over several dozens of duplicates and no one is working on them. KDE/Gnome/etc. developers are busy adding new features and breaking old APIs. Fixing bugs is of course a tedious and difficult chore.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Steep learning curve (even today you oftentimes need to use a CLI to complete some trivial or non-trivial tasks, e.g. when installing third party software).</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Incomplete or sometimes missing regression testing in the Linux kernel (and, alas, in other Open Source software too) leading to a situation when new kernels may become totally unusable for some hardware configurations (software suspend doesn't work, crashes, unable to boot, networking problems, video tearing, etc.)</li><li class="ql-align-justify">GUI network manager in Linux has serious problems.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">Poor interoperability between the kernel and user-space applications. E.g. many kernel features get a decent user-space implementation years after introduction.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Linux security/permissions management is a bloody mess: PAM, SeLinux, Udev, HAL (replaced with udisk/upower/libudev), PolicyKit, ConsoleKit and usual Unix permissions (/etc/passwd, /etc/group) all have their separate incompatible permissions management systems spread all over the file system. Quite often people cannot use their digital devices unless they switch to a super user.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">No sandbox with easy to use GUI (like Sandboxie in Windows).</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! CLI (command line interface) errors for user applications. All GUI applications should have a visible error representation.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Certain Linux components have very poor documentation and lack good manuals.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! No unified widely used system for packages signing and verification (thus it becomes increasingly problematic to verify packages which are not included by your distro). No central body to issue certificates and to sign packages.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">There are no native antivirus solutions or similar software for Linux (the existing ones are made for finding Windows viruses and analyzing Windows executives - i.e. they are more or less useless for Linux). Say, you want to install new software which is not included by your distro - currently there's no way to check if it's malicious or not.</li><li class="ql-align-justify">!! Most Linux distributions do not audit included packages which means a rogue evil application or a rogue evil patch can easily make it into most distros, thus endangering the end user (it has happened several times already).</li><li class="ql-align-justify">! Very bad backwards and forward compatibility.</li>
Hey, I love when people are saying this, however here's a list of Linux problems which affect pretty much every Linux user.
<p class="ql-align-justify"> </p>Applications and features sorely missing in Linux Here I don't even want to talk about Microsoft Office or pretty much all AAA games which are missing in Linux, I want to talk about crucial basic features of the desktop OS.
A lot of people who are new to Linux or those who use a very tiny subset of applications are quick to disregard the entire list saying things like, "Audio in Linux works just fine for me." or "I've never had any troubles with video in Linux." Guess what, there are thousands of users who have immense problems because they have a different set of hardware or software. Do yourself a favour - come and visit Ubuntu or Linux.com forums and count the number of threads which contain "I have erased PulseAudio and only now audio works for me" or "I have finally discovered I can use nouveau instead of NVIDIA binary drivers (or vice versa) and my problems are gone." There's another important thing that critics fail to understand. If something doesn't work in Linux, people will not care whose fault it is, they will automatically and rightly assume it's Linux's fault. For the average Joe, Linux is just another operating system. He or she doesn't care if a particular company ABC chose not to support Linux or not to release fully-functional drivers for Linux - their hard earned hardware just doesn't work, i.e. Linux doesn't work. People won't care if Skype crashes every five minutes under some circumstances - even though in reality Skype is an awful piece of software which has tonnes of glitches and sometimes crashes even under Windows and MacOS. I want to refute a common misconception, that support for older hardware in Linux is a lot better than in Windows. It's partly true but it's also false. For instance neither nouveau nor proprietary NVIDIA drivers have good support for older NVIDIA GPUs. Nouveau's OpenGL acceleration speed is lacking, NVIDIA's blob doesn't support many crucial features found in Xrandr or features required for proper acceleration of modern Linux GUIs (like Gnome 3 or KDE4). In case your old hardware is magically still supported, Linux drivers almost always offer only a small subset of features found in Windows drivers, so saying that Linux hardware support is better, just because you don't have to spend 20 minutes installing drivers, is unfair at best. Some comments just astonish me: "This was terrible. I mean, it's full of half-truths and opinions. NVIDIA Optimus (Then don't use it, go with Intel or something else)." No shit, sir! I've bought my laptop to enjoy games in Wine/dualboot and you dare tell me I shouldn't have bought in the first place? I kindly suggest that you not impose your opinion on other people who can actually get pleasure from playing high quality games. Saying that SSHFS is a replacement for Windows File Sharing is the most ridiculous thing that I've heard in my entire life. It's worth noting that the most vocal participants of the Open Source community are extremely bitchy and overly idealistic people peremptorily requiring everything to be open source and free or it has no right to exist at all in Linux.With an attitude like this, it's no surprise that a lot of companies completely disregard and shun the Linux desktop. Linus Torvalds once talked about this: There are "extremists" in the free software world, but that's one major reason why I don't call what I do "free software" any more. I don't want to be associated with the people for whom it's about exclusion and hatred. Most importantly this list is not an opinion. Almost every listed point has links to appropriate articles, threads and discussions centered on it, proving that I haven't pulled it out of my < expletive >. And please always check your "facts". I'm not really sorry for citing slashdot comments as a proof of what I'm writing about here, since I have one very strong justification for doing that - the /. crowd is very large, it mostly consists of smart people, IT specialists, scientists, etc. - and if a comment over there gets promoted to +5 insightful it usually* means that many people share the same opinion or have the same experience. This article was discussed on Slashdot, Reddit, Hacker News and Lobste.rs in 2017. * I previously said "certainly" instead of "usually" but after this text was called "hysterical nonsense" (a rebuttal is here) I decided not to use this word any more. On a positive note If you get an impression that Linux sucks - you are largely wrong. For a limited or/and non-professional use Linux indeed shines as a desktop OS - when you run it you can be sure that you are malware free. You can safely install and uninstall software without fearing that your system will break up. At the same time innate Windows problems (listed at the beginning of the article) are almost impossible to fix unless Microsoft starts from scratch - Linux problems are indeed approachable. What's more, Linux, unlike Windows 10, doesn't collect data on you and doesn't send it anywhere. Also there are several projects underway which are intended to simplify, modernize and unify the Linux desktop. They are NetworkManager, systemd, Wayland, file system unification first proposed and implemented by Fedora, and others. Unfortunately no one is working towards stabilizing Linux, so the only alternative to Windows in the Linux world is Red Hat Enterprise Linux and its derivative (CentOS). Many top tier 3D game engines now support Linux natively (with reservations): CryEngine, Unreal Engine 4, Unity Engine, Source Engine 2.0 and others. Valve Software released Steam for Linux and ported the Source engine for Linux and also they developed a Steam gaming machine which is based on Linux. Valve's efforts have resulted in a number of AAA game titles having been made available natively for Linux, e.g. Metro Last Light. Valve since then have ported a lot of their games to Linux. NVIDIA made their drivers more compatible with bumblebee, however NVIDIA themselves don't want to support Optimus under Linux - maybe because X.org/kernel architectures are not very suitable for that. Also NVIDIA started to provide certain very limited documentation for their GPUs. Linus Torvalds believes Linux APIs have recently become much more stable - however I don't share his optimism ;). Ubuntu developers listened to me and created a new unified packaging format. More on it here and here. Fedora developers decided to follow Ubuntu's lead and they're contemplating making the installation of third-party non-free software easy and trouble free. The Linux Foundation formed a new initiative to support critical Open Source Projects. An application level firewall named Douane has been graciously donated to the Linux community. Thanks a lot to its author! Starting March 2017 you can watch Netflix in Linux. In 2018 thanks to the DXVK project Linux gamers are now able to run DirectX 11 Windows games on Linux - Wine's own implementation is severly lacking and will probably be replaced with DXVK. In August 2018 Valve released Proton for Steam: this compatibility layer based on Wine, allows you to run native Windows games from the Steam catalogue in Linux without using any tricks with almost native speed. Its only drawback is that it requires a modern enough GPU which supports Vulkan. More and more games are now coded using the Vulkan API and they work just fine under Linux. In 2022, Valve released a Linux-based gaming handheld, Steam Deck that runs Windows games via Wine/DXKV (Proton) which ultimately means that developers are spurred to make their Windows game run flawlessly under "emulation". On May 11, 2022 NVIDIA released their Linux kernel driver as open source. At the time of release it is very incomplete and allows only to be used for NVIDIA GPUs in data centers as display driving bits are missing. This is a major development as it simplifies, streamlines and makes possible a ton of things not possible before, e.g. full secure boot, proper Optimus support, using GPL only symbols in the kernel, etc. etc. etc. Sadly only the latest two NVIDIA GPU architectures are supported: Ampere and Turing. The users of older GPUs still need to use the proprietary kernel module. DXVK (a DirectX 9-11 translation layer to Vulkan) has seen a major success recently thanks to Valve's sponsorship. Many Windows games run under Linux with little to no performance loss or in some cases even faster than under Windows. Intel has started to use it for its discrete GPUs. Rant Linux used to have a tendency to mess with your data. In the recent past at least three critical errors in the Linux kernel led to data loss and that's utterly unacceptable. At least RHEL users are relatively safe. There are two different camps in regard to the intrinsic security of open and closed source applications. My stance is quite clear: Linux security leaves a lot to be desired. There are no code analyzers/antiviruses so you have no way to check if a certain application, which is published as a source code or binaries, is safe to use. Also time and again we've seen that open source projects are hardly reviewed/scrutinized at all which also means that an attacker can send a patch to Linus Torvalds and add a backdoor to the Linux kernel. Critical bugs which make it impossible to use your hardware/software in Linux stay open for years! I reported the fact that my webcam is broken (completely black output under certain video modes) in 2013(!!). This webcam is one of the most popular - no one bats an eye. For my new Skylake laptop I filed eight bug reports and seven of them remain open. Six of them have received no response at all. Nil. No one gives a damn. True inter-distro compatibility? "WTF are you talking about?", ask Linux distro developers. Debian dropped LSB support in 2015. Recently Ubuntu developers decided to make it possible to run new software in old distros by using the SNAPPY packaging format which is basically an application emulation layer. Wow. Effing great. I mean it's great such a thing has been finally implemented but it's the wrong way, guys! Font problems: in case you've reached this page and you still want good/best/top/free fonts for Linux, download them from here. It seems like many people come to this website looking for the best desktop linux distro in 2023. <p class="ql-align-justify"> </p>Solving Linux A lot of people wonder if Linux can be "solved", i.e. if there's anything that might be done to make Linux a real alternative to Windows and Mac OS X on the desktop. I have to admit that this will be a tall order and at least two well-known companies have already failed: the most recent example is a company from Africa, Ubuntu, and you might be surprised to know that Corel also tried at the beginning of the 21'st century (google for Corel Linux). Without further ado let's describe the process: At first, you have to have very deep pockets: we are talking about at least a billion USD in cash for the first five years. When you have that kind of money you create a Linux company. Then you hire at least 90% of open source developers. You'll have to poach quite a lot of them from RedHat/Intel/Ubuntu/etc., including Linus Torvalds. Then you start developing a Linux platform while sticking to these principles (also outlined here and here):
Linus hoped Valve would solve the packaging / libraries / distros zoo, only Valve never did. Steam on Linux basically comes with all the libraries it needs, which means it doesn't use your distro libraries at all, so games written for Steam are not compiled for a gazillion of libraries / distros and their variations, they are built against Steam libraries instead. In short when you're running Steam, you have one extra distro installed, Steam Linux. Some people argue that flatpak, snap, appimage are exactly what Linus has been looking for. Only, why do we have ... the three of them? Why each of them looks, feels and behaves like a virtual machine which means Linux distros solved the compatibility issue ... by making you install an extra Linux distro? A lot of disk space is, of course, lost, these apps take a lot longer to launch and have a quite higher RAM consumption. Ultimately the long-standing issue hasn't been resolved to any capacity, instead it has been hidden, pushed aside and virtualized. Only you can have a Linux distro installed in Windows 10 as part of WSL. Linux on the desktop itself remains a huge incompatibility mess. If you watched the entire video you'd notice some guy mentioning he could perfectly run Linux applications from 1995 in his 2014 Debian system. That's a good point. Notice, however that all the applications he mentioned were console applications with most likely a bare minimum of dependencies, e.g. they didn't use anything outside Glibc. I dare him run a KDE1.0 application in his Debian 2021 system. It will fail spectacularly. Meanwhile most properly written Win32 applications (using only the official APIs and not using drivers) written for Windows 95 work just fine in Windows 10 26 years later. At least for X11 we had its own GUI APIs, including Xlib (LibX11) and XCB. Wayland on the other hand offers absolutely nothing aside from pushing bitmaps onto the screen, so native Wayland applications will have an even shorter life span. <p class="ql-align-justify"> </p>Windows 11 vs. Linux If you or your company are seriously thinking about the ramifications of using Windows 11 and you're pretty scared of the prospects of running the OS which collects a ton of telemetry and deprives you of the control of its crucial features (for instance you cannot officially disable telemetry, windows updates, or Windows Defender) then I guess you're asking yourself a question: what should we do? If you're buying and deploying new workstations you might consider installing Linux. By doing so you'll be helping the open source community by increasing the userbase and possibly finding, reporting and even eliminating bugs in case you have software developers in your organization. Of course, you might want to run applications which have no equivalents under Linux. In this case you have two options: you may either run Windows as a virtual machine or you may try using Wine. Wine is very powerful software which allows you to run Windows applications under Linux at near native speed (sometimes even faster). Unlike Windows 11 Linux doesn't require TPM or very new CPUs to work which allows computers to operate longer. At the same time it's worth noting that Windows 11 offers a very high level of security out of the box vs. Linux' Evil Maid attack (it can be solved in certain distros by encrypting the /boot partition but unless it's implemented in GUI in a user-friendly form for major distros such as Ubuntu and Fedora, I consider this issue unresolved). © 2009-2023 Artem S. Tashkinov. Last revised: August 12, 2023. The most current version can be found here. <p class="ql-align-justify"> </p>Additions to and well-grounded critiques of this list are welcomed. Mind that irrational comments lacking substance or factual information might be removed. Anonymous comments are pre-moderated disabled. I'm tired of anonymous haters who have nothing to say. Besides, Disqus sports authentification via Google/Twitter/Facebook and if you don't have any of these accounts then I'm sorry for your seclusion. You might as well not exist at all. This is isn't a work in progress any longer (however I update this list from time to time). There is nothing serious left that I can think of. Please, excuse me for grammatical and spelling errors. I'm not a native English speaker. ;-) It'd be amazing if someone proof read this article and sent me the result. In case there are dead links in this article, you can find their live versions via WayBack Machine, archive.is or by Googling respective page titles. About the author: Artem S. Tashkinov is an avid supporter of the Open Source movement and Open Source projects. He has helped resolve numerous bugs across many open source projects such as the Linux kernel, KDE, Wine, GCC, Midnight Commander, X.org and many others. He's been using Linux distros exclusively since 1999. I'm searching for a permanent job (with relocation) as a systems administrator in Down Under; you can download my stripped (for security reasons) CV here. © 2009-2023 Artem S. Tashkinov - all rights reserved. You can reproduce any part of this text verbatim, but you must retain the authorship and provide a link to this document. The archive of this page can be found here. <p class="ql-align-justify"> </p>Ways to support the author, thank you!
|
Windows fanlığından başka bir şey değil. Siz de ağır bir Windows fanısınız gördüğüm kadarıyla. ![]() |
Temel bazı şeyleri bilmiyorsunuz : Fan / fanatik vs bunlar sığ pek birey bilmeden birşeyleri savunanlara denir .. Esas fanları görüyoruz . Sürücü problemi çözüldü diyenlerden tut başla uzun bir yelpaze var.. Yaptığım hem güncel deneyimlerim hem de benden daha fazla kapsamlı araştırılmış raporlanmış kaynakları oluşturulmuş bir makaleden bahsettim diye fanatik olunmaz. Şu olabilir : Hakikat fanatikliği belki bir anlamı olabilir... Windows ta sorunlar var ama Linux tekiler çok köklü çok yaygın ve bol. Üstelik o makalede 2024 teki gelmiş geçmiş en büyük güvenlik riskini nükleer felaketlere varacak para piyaslarını yok edebilecek Linux teki test Kernel inden sızma teşebüsüdür. Adamlar Test kernel inden girecekler sonra o kernel birkaç yıl sonra final olarak heryerde aktiflenecek Android akıllı e-kitap okuyucuları, Linux dağıtımlıları özellikle kurumsal olanlar keza para ödüyorlar beleşte değil ... İnsanlar kurumsal Linux dağıtımlıların paralı olduğunu da bilmez! Microsoft gibi ücretliler... Ama temel güvenlik kısmına bakıyoruz Kernel de yetkili kişi psikolojik sorunları var yıllardır da bu kişi(lere) emanet! Açık kaynak! Ne ironidir ki Microsoft çalışanı ama boş vaktinde hobi vs amaçlı merak ediyor ne görsün şüpheli hareketler işkilleniyor ve olayı çözüyor ... Linux dağıtımlılarını kurtaran bir Microsoft çalışanı olmuş ... Microsoft zaten yıllardır Linux u kendi kernel ine sağlam entegre de ediyor ... Yani Linux te olan ama Microsoft ta olmayan şeyler varsa da artık Windows altında kullanılmaktadır ... Microsoft un Linux e yakınsaması özümsemesi tesadüfi hayırlara da vesile olmaktadır. İbretlik Kernel e sızmalarından görüyoruz. Yıllarca sinsi sinsi ilerlemişler. Özgür Kaynak işte böyle yoz çakal ortamlarda NAİFLİĞİN DİKALASIDIR . Aman dikkat. Nasıl ki bir bebeği dışarıda başıboş bırakılmaz o misal ... Açık Kaynak sığ ele alınca hoş ama pratikte neler yaşanıyor acımasız çakal farklı ajandaları olanlarca nelere alet ediliyoru da kabak gibi ortadadır. Nedensellik ve analoji ile objektif bakış açısı kişisel veya kollektif prangalardan ayıklanmış birkaç kelam ediliyor diye FANLIK mı oluyor ? Yoksa sen vantilatördeki fandan mı bahsediyorsun ? |
Dediğim gibi yıllar önce Linux kullanmışsın hala öyle zannediyorsun Linux’u. ![]() Ayrıca sunucuların çok büyük bir kısmı Linux kullanıyor. Neden acaba? Çünkü Windows gibi ikide bir çöken yapıda olmadığı için olabilir mi? Her hafta mavi ekran sistem sorunlarıyla karşılaşıyoruz. Maşallah çok stabil. ![]() Söyleyebildiğin tek şey sürücü. Bırakın bu safsataları. Oyunculuk desen o da var. Al buyur. https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=ADA_SX9cKBTXkvuY&v=P7Hb_dWSeVU&feature=youtu.be Bir de Recall denen bir saçmalık çıkardılar. Yaptığın her şeyi kaydediyor. Güya deneyimi daha da iyi hale getiriyor. Kesin öyledir. ![]() |
< Bu ileti mobil sürüm kullanılarak atıldı > Bu mesaja 1 cevap geldi. Cevapları Gizle
Bu mesajda bahsedilenler: @Linux Super User